GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: exo vs GLM-5.2

  1. exoHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
exo50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
GLM-5.2100/100100/10032/10081/1000/10087/100
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$1.40/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$4.40/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.26/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
12K
310K
Completed sessions
236,908
640,225
Token share
0%
0.14%
Tokens
33B+100%
1.4T-84%
AUG 17OCT 11
AUG 17OCT 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
48.7%34K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.